Platform for Architectural Transfers in the Indian Ocean rim
About  |  

UPCOMING
CONVERSATION


Material and Construction Histories
Thursday 9 April 2026, 5.00 pm IST


> Registration link <


Respondent: Nachiket Chanchani
(University of Michigan)



Politics of Bricks

Spriya Sharma
(School of Planning and Architecture, Delhi)

At the Chhatrams of Thanjavur, brick was far more than a structural necessity; it was an art form where intricate carvings transformed simple blocks into welcoming, spiritual spaces for travellers. But why was brick chosen for these rest houses while stone was reserved for temples? While not every region in India could match the excellence found in Thanjavur, the desire to elevate brick into art, by chipping it or creating false joints, was a shared instinct among masons.

When the British arrived, they introduced a conflict of "architectural morality." They debated whether it was "dishonest" to conceal brick under layers of plaster or to carve it in imitation of stone's prestige. They eventually sought to retrain Indian masons to follow the rigid, uniform logic of British masonry, pushing aside local artistic traditions. It leaves us to wonder: did we truly learn something new, or did we simply forget what we already knew?

The identity of the brick is deeply complex. It is frequently labelled a
"common man's material" simply because it is born from the earth available beneath our feet. But is that really true? While clay is abundant, the creation of a brick is a complex, step-by-step craft, from the precise moulding and drying to the finality of the firing.

In the end, whether a society chooses to use brick, hide it, or carve it tells us a lot about their priorities, their hierarchies, and their relationship with the land they build upon. Even brick shortages, which have occurred in history, were tackled in ways that reveal a society's priorities.


Brick Ecologies: Farm, Soil, and Land at the Edges of Urban Expansion

Akshar Gajjar
(EPFL, Lausanne)

Brick made in the agrarian landscapes of Charotar, Gujarat is not only a construction material but an active mediator of land relations between agriculture and urban expansion of Anand City. The clayey fertile soil that grows paddy, banana, bajra, cotton, is also ideal for making bricks on the kins that are nested within farmlands. As brick kilns utilize the surrounding soil, they slowly transform the productive capacities of these lands, thus making them susceptible to speculative construction. This relation between brick, farm soil and land relations is entangled within structures of state, caste and class that govern, whose land is transformed, using whose labor, and who profits from these transformations. My work aims to trace the making and use of brick in Gujarat to unravel transforming ecologies and land relations and further investigate how the two are co-forming.

In this presentation I will unpack the triad of brickmaking, land transformation and construction through the methodology of itineraries, rather than linear commodity chains. In preliminary fieldwork on kins during monsoon closure, unexpected movements became visible - cows, buffaloes, goats, shepherds, broken bricks, and crops moving in and around dormant kilns - that do not fit neatly into a sequential journey of extraction, production, transport, and use. What does following shorter itineraries of different bricks and humans, nonhumans and objects around them tell us about the embeddedness of urban expansion within the constellation of rural ecologies?


PAST
CONVERSATIONS
PATIO Conversation No. 17 | 
PATIO & SAHANZ Conference 2025

PATIO Conversation No. 16 |
Alican Taylan & Bérénice Girard

PATIO Conversation No. 15 |
Patrick Zamarian & Tanya Talwar
PATIO Conversation No. 14 |
Think Matter x The Funambulist
PATIO Conversation No. 13 |
Priya Joseph & Vishvesh Kandolkar
PATIO Conversation No. 12 |
Sarah Melsens, Ishita Shah & Pamudu Tennakoon

PATIO Conversation No. 11 | 
Madhumati A., Zahra Yasmoon & Nirodha Dissanayake
PATIO Conversation No. 10 |
Nicholas Bill & Chee Kien Lai

PATIO Conversation No. 09 | 
Swati Chattopadhyay & Megha Chand Inglis

PATIO Conversation No. 08 |
Labib Hossain & Javairia Shahid


PATIO Conversation No. 07 |  
Shaikhah Ali Alsalhi & Ali Javid

PATIO Conversation No. 06 |
Sarover Zaidi & Saniya Siddiqui




PATIO Conversations No. 05 |
Mehwish Abid & Johann Peiris



PATIO Conversations No. 04 |
Meenakshi A. & Richa Shah


PATIO Conversations No. 03 |
Anthony Wako & Dhaval Chauhan


PATIO Conversations No. 02 |
Kairavi Maniar & Esa Shaikh



PATIO Conversations No. 01 | 
Chetan Sahasrabudhe & Ashmita Gupta





PATIO
CONVERSATIONS

PATIO Conversations are open to all; we aim to meet once a month, and scholars get an opportunity to share their work in progress. These presentations may be on a topic of their choice, which may relate to one or more of PATIO’s thematic umbrellas, or even critically reconsider and reconfigure our definition of particular themes. Participants may include independent scholars, Master's students, or aspiring PhD students as well as postdoctoral researchers who can contribute as speakers or choose to be an active part of the audience. Each such conversation foregrounds two scholars presenting their work for 20 minutes, followed by feedback from relevant respondents invited by the PATIO team in relation to the topic, and finally opening the discussion out to the larger audience. As such, PATIO
Conversations offer a platform for critical dialogue while both disseminating recently completed work and providing mentorship to aspirant researchers, including potential PhD candidates. These sessions provide researchers with the resources to further their work related to the state of the field by involving active experts and engaging with current bodies of relevant work, published or otherwise.

PATIO Conversations is directed by Saptarshi Sanyal and Sarah Melsens with the help of Thematic directors and Coordinators.